Skip to main content
RICH Home Loans LLC

Should a First-Time Buyer Do FHA or Conventional 3% Down?

The honest answer: if your FICO is 680 or higher and your debt-to-income (DTI) fits inside conventional guidelines, Conventional 3% almost always wins long-term — because the mortgage insurance comes off when you reach 20% equity. FHA mortgage insurance stays for the life of the loan when you put less than 10% down. Below 680, FHA usually wins on payment because conventional MI gets expensive fast at lower scores. The three-way decision is FICO band, MI cost at your score, and how long you plan to keep the loan.

The handbook view (what the rules actually say)

Both programs allow first-time buyers in with low down payments, but the program rules are very different in places that matter:

The plain-English translation

The single biggest difference between these two loans isn't the down payment — it's the mortgage insurance:

Side-by-side: where each program wins

ScenarioFHA 3.5%Conventional 3%Usual winner
FICO 760+, low DTIEligible, MIP for lifeEligible, PMI is cheap and falls offConventional
FICO 700–759EligiblePMI moderate, removableConventional (usually)
FICO 680–699Eligible, payment competitivePMI starts to biteRun both — depends on PMI quote
FICO 640–679Eligible, often cheaper monthlyPMI gets expensiveFHA (usually)
FICO 580–639Eligible at 3.5% downGenerally not eligible at 3% downFHA
High DTI (45%+)More flexible — often goes to 50%+Tighter — generally caps at 45–50% with strong factorsFHA
Buying a 2–4 unit primary residenceAllowed (house-hacking)3%-down programs generally restrict to 1-unitFHA
Plan to keep the loan 7+ yearsMIP drag never ends without a refiPMI falls off, then it's just principal + interestConventional

The table is a rule of thumb, not a quote. PMI pricing varies by mortgage insurer and the specific loan profile — two borrowers with the same FICO can get different PMI rates. The right move is to actually price both scenarios with the same loan amount and compare the monthly + the total cost over 7 years.

Why your loan officer might be pushing FHA when Conventional would be better

This is the part most consumer-finance articles won't say out loud. Loan-officer compensation is structurally different on government loans (FHA, VA, USDA) than on conventional, and not every lender prices conventional competitively. The combination creates an incentive to steer borrowers who qualify for both into the program where the LO and the lender make more — even when the borrower's long-term cost would be lower on the other side.

What that looks like in practice:

  • You qualify for both, but you're only quoted the FHA payment.
  • The Conventional quote you do see has uncompetitive PMI (because the lender hasn't shopped MI providers, or doesn't have access to lower-cost MI partners).
  • The "FHA is for first-time buyers" framing gets repeated as if Conventional 3% (a program literally built for first-time buyers) doesn't exist.

How to test it: ask for both quotes side-by-side, with the same loan amount, on the same day. Ask specifically for the PMI rate at your FICO and LTV. If the lender can't or won't produce that, that's the answer.

Lender overlays — where the rules get tighter

The handbook minimums above are the program floor. Individual lenders impose "overlays" — tighter rules on top of the program rule. Two lenders can both legally offer FHA loans yet behave very differently:

Which lenders we actually use for this scenario

[Rich's notes — to be added]

For a buyer comparing FHA 3.5% to Conventional 3%, the three lenders we go to first, why we go to them, and which two we generally avoid for this profile.

Real-world cases

[Rich's notes — to be added]

Two anonymized cases: one where FHA was the right call despite a 700+ FICO (specific DTI / property-type factors), one where Conventional 3% beat FHA despite a 620s FICO (specific PMI quote, lender overlay). Both are composites used to illustrate the decision pattern, not specific borrower files.

How the big retail lenders typically handle this

[Rich's notes — to be added]

What Rocket / UWM / a typical megabank actually quotes when a 680-FICO first-time buyer asks for both options — based on quotes we've seen from clients shopping us against them. Numbers will be approximate ranges, not exact, and tied to a recent month so the comparison is honest.

A simple decision rule

For a first-time buyer who hasn't shopped yet, the cleanest 30-second filter:

  1. 1FICO 680+ and DTI under 45%? Start with Conventional 3% — make the lender prove FHA wins, not the other way around.
  2. 2FICO 580–679 or higher DTI? Start with FHA — but ask for the Conventional 3% number anyway, in case PMI prices in your favor.
  3. 3Buying a 2–4 unit you'll live in? Almost always FHA — the 3%-down conventional programs don't allow it.
  4. 4Plan to keep the loan 7+ years and you qualify for both? Lean Conventional — the MI-removal math compounds.

Related

Run both numbers, then decide

Our pre-qual tool quotes FHA and Conventional 3% side-by-side with full PITI + PMI/MIP, no credit pull. If the math is close, that's exactly when an actual conversation saves money.